MiM merujuk kepada entri
FB Analisis Politik Terkini yang menyiarkan kenyataan akhbar Yuktes Vijay yang mendakwa pernah terlibat dalam kes Anwar liwat Saiful Bukhari.
The real story of Anwar’s Sodomy 2 ( Part 1)
I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from
day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to scoop to
this extent is just mind boggling. Now
I was working with one of Anwar’s long time lawyers during the whole
course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial itself, And when
I mention A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA experts to
reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions, I
was involved in everything.
I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer here as I revere him as
my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this frustration and anger
pouring of mine.
Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The truth is he
was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to
withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now
ally Datuk Yusof.
If you Pakatanians have doubt, why not ask him to these questions and
get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it.
• Why did Anwar personally and specifically requested his Chief of
Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents
when there were other staffs there ;
• How come Saiful was aware of the code name to enter the apartment
which was “Mokhtar”, the name of Anwar’s security chief and
brother-in-law? ;
• Video evidence that was send to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirms the
presence of the Saiful in the apartment so how can Saiful’s presence in
the apartment be refuted ;
• Why was Saiful afforded special treatment ie he was given his own
room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a
new staff ;
• Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and
told him about Saiful apparent afflictions to BN, why was the call not
heeded by Anwar?
Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the onslaught by the
Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to take stand
in the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in
conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like
persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist.
Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned the fees
that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald
and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what people of the general public have
been made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they
were here, they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar pay from his
own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very rich
Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons
known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding expenditure
of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay these
experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can
have Datuks funding his legal expences, what is wrong in having Datuks
funding the wedding of the PM’s daughter?
Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is
that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer,
Jude Perreira ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and
decided to do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only thing that
stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain of
evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself
deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there were evidence of Anwar’s semen in Saiful’s rectum.
However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question mark over
the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s evidence.
Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using
Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all
know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that bit of
“charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your modus
operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch
Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action.
And remember the e-mails, Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me!
Yuktes Vijay
A former Anwarista, worked in Anwar’s Sodomy 2 trial for defence council
MiM : Kita tunggu respons Anwar tentang pendedahan terbaru ini.
No comments:
Post a Comment